[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a16M3nv+TQWsC-0Pr5M2vcTttC2WWTzctMBaqdODMFX-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:17:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/9] irqchip: Add Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller driver
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:29 AM Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static int sp_intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct irq_chip sp_intc_chip = {
> + .name = "sp_intc",
> + .irq_ack = sp_intc_ack_irq,
> + .irq_mask = sp_intc_mask_irq,
> + .irq_unmask = sp_intc_unmask_irq,
> + .irq_set_type = sp_intc_set_type,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .irq_set_affinity = sp_intc_set_affinity,
> +#endif
> +};
I don't think you need to define an irq_set_affinity() callback at all if you
just return -EINVAL, all the callers should have a check already. Even
if you do need the function, I think you can remove the #ifdef, as long
as the function itself can be built that way.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists