linux-kernel - Re: filesystem corruption with "scsi: core: Reallocate device's budget map on queue depth change"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YkUOip75R8DH613s@T590>
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:14:34 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>,
        Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@...e.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem corruption with "scsi: core: Reallocate device's
 budget map on queue depth change"

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 07:30:35AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 3/30/22 22:48, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 09:31:35AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 13:59 +0100, John Garry wrote:
> >>> On 30/03/2022 12:21, Andrea Righi wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:38:02AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> >>>>> On 30/03/2022 11:11, Andrea Righi wrote:
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> after this commit I'm experiencing some filesystem corruptions
> >>>>>> at boot on a power9 box with an aacraid controller.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At the moment I'm running a 5.15.30 kernel; when the filesystem
> >>>>>> is mounted at boot I see the following errors in the console:
> >>>
> >>> About "scsi: core: Reallocate device's budget map on queue depth
> >>> change" being added to a stable kernel, I am not sure if this was
> >>> really a fix  or just a memory optimisation.
> >>
> >> I can see how it becomes the problem: it frees and allocates a new
> >> bitmap across a queue freeze, but bits in the old one might still be in
> >> use.  This isn't a problem except when they return and we now possibly
> >> see a tag greater than we think we can allocate coming back. 
> >> Presumably we don't check this and we end up doing a write to
> >> unallocated memory.
> >>
> >> I think if you want to reallocate on queue depth reduction, you might
> >> have to drain the queue as well as freeze it.
> > 
> > After queue is frozen, there can't be any in-flight request/scsi
> > command, so the sbitmap is zeroed at that time, and safe to reallocate.
> > 
> > The problem is aacraid specific, since the driver has hard limit
> > of 256 queue depth, see aac_change_queue_depth().
> 
> 256 is the scsi hard limit per device... Any SAS drive has the same limit
> by default since there is no way to know the max queue depth of a scsi
> disk.So what is special about aacraid ?
> 

I meant aac_change_queue_depth() sets hard limit of 256.

Yeah, for any hba driver which implements its own .change_queue_depth(),
there may be one hard limit there.

So I still don't understand why you mention '256 is the scsi hard limit per
device', and where is the code? If both .cma_per_lun and .can_queue are > 256
and the driver uses default scsi_change_queue_depth() and sdev->tagged_supported
is true, then user is free to change queue depth via /sys/block/$SDN/device/queue_depth
to > 256. It is same for SAS, see sas_change_queue_depth().

Also I am pretty sure some type of scsi device is capable of supporting >256 queue
depth, include sas, and sas usually has big queue depth.


Thanks,
Ming