linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: hugetlb: Enable HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:46:25 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "Bodeddula, Balasubramaniam" <bodeddub@...zon.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, james.morse@....com,
        Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@...edance.com>,
        Muchun Song <smuchun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: hugetlb: Enable HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
 for arm64

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:41 AM Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:54:00 +0800 Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ config HUGETLB_PAGE
> >
> >  config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> >       def_bool HUGETLB_PAGE
> > -     depends on X86_64
> > +     depends on X86_64 || ARM64
>
> This list is just going to get longer, until someone goes and switches
> it to use ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP or whatever.  Why not do
> that now?

Good suggestion. Yep, the line is going to be long if someone
wants to enable it for other architectures in the future.  Will do.
Thanks.