[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkcnXxNjMNdDgEBt@ninjato>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:25:03 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] mmc: improve API to make clear {h|s}w_reset is
for cards
> I tested it with my Renesas boards, so far no regressions. Buildbots are
Wishful thinking, the patches crash now when booting. Still checking
what is the difference to when I send the patches out.
Still, looking forward to comments on the general approach.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists