lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkcoQh7jzltS8wiW@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:28:50 -0400
From:   Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the
 block tree

On Fri, Apr 01 2022 at  1:20P -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 09:44:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the device-mapper tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   include/linux/bio.h
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   57c47b42f454 ("block: turn bio_kmalloc into a simple kmalloc wrapper")
> > 
> > from the block tree and commit:
> > 
> >   135eaaabd22a ("block: allow using the per-cpu bio cache from bio_alloc_bioset")
> 
> Isn't this something Jens already had queued up in the block tree?
> 

Yes, but Jens hasn't staged 5.19 commits taken early in linux-next
yet.  So I just left the changes in linux-dm.git's for-next to get
coverage in the interim.

Mike

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ