[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-cda2a9b2-2e3a-41a8-8df9-ee3d05d47a1a@palmer-mbp2014>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: bagasdotme@...il.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, bagasdotme@...il.com,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>, atishp@...shpatra.org,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: riscv: remove non-existent document from table of contents
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 01:44:28 PDT (-0700), bagasdotme@...il.com wrote:
> Remove reference to non-existent pmu.rst from table of contents tree
> in Documentation/riscv/index.rst.
>
> Fixes: 23b1f18326ec ("Documentation: riscv: Remove the old
> documentation")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20220329133412.591d6882@canb.auug.org.au/
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/riscv/index.rst | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/index.rst b/Documentation/riscv/index.rst
> index ea915c1960488a..e23b876ad6ebb6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/riscv/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/riscv/index.rst
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ RISC-V architecture
>
> boot-image-header
> vm-layout
> - pmu
> patch-acceptance
>
> features
>
> base-commit: 1930a6e739c4b4a654a69164dbe39e554d228915
Adding the doc folks.
I'm going to go ahead and just take this via the RISC-V tree, as I just
broke things. I'd usually wait for longer for an ack/review, but IMO
it's saner to just get this into rc1 so builds don't break. My version
[1] was sent at the same time and was CC'd to the right place, but I'm
going to take this one instead.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220329164544.29367-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists