[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49a391f2636d4bb193b80c301ce0832d@cqplus1.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:17:52 +0000
From: qinjian[覃健] <qinjian@...lus1.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 7/9] irqchip: Add Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller
driver
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:29 AM Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com> wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +static int sp_intc_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip sp_intc_chip = {
> > + .name = "sp_intc",
> > + .irq_ack = sp_intc_ack_irq,
> > + .irq_mask = sp_intc_mask_irq,
> > + .irq_unmask = sp_intc_unmask_irq,
> > + .irq_set_type = sp_intc_set_type,
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > + .irq_set_affinity = sp_intc_set_affinity,
> > +#endif
> > +};
>
> I don't think you need to define an irq_set_affinity() callback at all if you
> just return -EINVAL, all the callers should have a check already. Even
> if you do need the function, I think you can remove the #ifdef, as long
> as the function itself can be built that way.
>
> Arnd
Thanks for your comments, I'll remove this empty function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists