linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] of/platform: Drop static setup of IRQ resource from DT core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:41:33 +0100
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] of/platform: Drop static setup of IRQ resource from
 DT core

Hi Rob,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:02 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:06:33PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > Now that all the DT drivers have switched to platform_get_irq() we can now
> > safely drop the static setup of IRQ resource from DT core code.
> >
> > With the above change hierarchical setup of irq domains is no longer
> > bypassed and thus allowing hierarchical interrupt domains to describe
> > interrupts using "interrupts" DT property.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Sending this as RFC as couple of more drivers need to hit -rc yet with
> > the platform_get_irq() change while that is in progress I wanted to get
> > some feedback on this patch.
>
> I just applied this on top of current master and pushed to my
> for-kernelci branch. It should show up in kernelCI in a bit. I did this
> before all the fixes too and there were definitely a couple of test
> regressions.
>
Any chance you can share the regressions or maybe the CI script so
that I can reproduce it locally.

Cheers,
Prabhakar