[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4eb43887-44a4-4693-8488-4847d80b6bd8@omp.ru>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:09:57 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: unSimple <unsimple1993@....com>
CC: <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] MIPS: ip22-gio: Add check for the return value of
kzalloc()
On 3/30/22 7:03 AM, unSimple wrote:
> OK, here is the new version.
That won't do, your original patch description should be here.
And it should be a fresh posting with [PATCH v2] in the subject.
> Signed-off-by: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
> ---
You need to describe what changes between v1 and v2 here...
> arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-gio.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-gio.c b/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-gio.c
> index dfc52f6..f94f58b 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-gio.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-gio.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,10 @@ static void ip22_check_gio(int slotno, unsigned long addr, int irq)
> printk(KERN_INFO "GIO: slot %d : %s (id %x)\n",
> slotno, name, id);
> gio_dev = kzalloc(sizeof *gio_dev, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
No need for empty line here.
> +if (!gio_dev)
> +return;
Hm, the tabs were there but they got eaten when I replied.
Your mail seems to be base64-encoded which I don't think is
acceptable for patches -- they should be posted as plain text.
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists