[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220401095436.oxdq2duhuudx2c4r@riteshh-domain>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:24:36 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, riteshh@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: Modify _require_batched_discard to improve
test coverage
On 22/04/01 11:27AM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> A recent ext4 patch discussed [1] that some devices (eg LVMs) can
> have a discard granularity as big as 42MB which makes it larger
> than the group size of ext4 FS with 1k BS. This causes the FITRIM
> IOCTL to fail on filesystems like ext4.
>
> This case was not correctly handle by "_require_batched_discard" as
> it incorrectly interpreted the FITRIM failure as fs not supporting
> the IOCTL. This caused the tests like generic/260 to incorectly
> report "not run" instead of "failed" in case of large discard
> granularity.
Ok, I looked at fstrim code and it does print [1]
"the discard operation is not supported" in case of rc == 1.
And if rc != 0 it will always returns EXIT_FAILURE.
So this patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Although it will be good to check if we can add a generic test case
using maybe lvm or dm device, where this device could report large
discard_granularity for actually excercising this code path
(rather then changing kernel code to test it).
-ritesh
[1]: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/blob/master/sys-utils/fstrim.c
>
> Fix "_require_batched_discard" to use a more accurate method
> to determine if discard is supported.
>
> [1] commit 173b6e383d2
> ext4: avoid trim error on fs with small groups
>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> common/rc | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists