[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b4dcf83-bb13-2159-d7c1-f0aadfc53566@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 16:18:46 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>,
<quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>, <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add pm8008 support for
sc7280-idp
On 4/1/2022 2:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) (2022-03-30 03:44:01)
>> On 3/25/2022 11:18 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> #include "pm8008.dtsi"
>>>
>>> and then the nodes below.
>>
>> You mean
>>
>> pm8008_bus: &i2c1 {
>>
>> status = "okay";
>>
>> };
>>
>> &pm8008_bus {
>>
>> #include "pm8008.dtsi"
>>
>> };
>>
>> and remaining nodes, right?
>>
> No. I meant what I wrote.
>
Okay thank you for elaborating,
> &pm8008_bus: &i2c1 {
but this still needs to be "pm8008_bus: &i2c {" right.. no '&' before
pm8008_bus.
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> #include "pm8008.dtsi"
>
> and then the pm8008.dtsi file would have
>
> &pm8008_bus {
> pm8008: pmic@8 {
> compatible = "qcom,pm8008";
> ...
> };
>
> pm8008_regulators: regulators@9 {
> compatible = "qcom,pm8008-regulators";
> ...
> };
> };
>
> and then this patch would modify those nodes with phandles.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists