linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add printk indexing maintainers on mention of printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:32:51 +0100
From:   Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add printk indexing maintainers on mention
 of printk_index

Petr Mladek writes:
>On Wed 2022-03-30 15:32:20, Chris Down wrote:
>> This will primarily catch new and changed printk_index_subsys_emit
>> calls, but it's also worth catching changes to other printk indexing
>> infrastructure outside of kernel/printk/index.c.
>>
>> This avoids churn due to missing ccs when adding new printk indexes, as
>> was the case recently for the first round of the XFS printk indexing
>> patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
>> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
>Nice trick. I was not aware of that K: entries.
>
>I have pushed the patch into printk/linux.git, branch for-5.19.
>
>We missed the direct 5.18 train. I will add the commit into
>a printk pull request for 5.18-rcX if there is any. But I think
>that it is not worth creating a pull request just with this change.
>
>I am going to make sure that you are added into CC in the meantime.
>I hope that they will add me at least ;-)

Sounds good, thank you! :-)