linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: cpufreq: mediatek: add mt8186 cpufreq dt-bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14bfabd88ecbe8cc4ec359f8249f180128a6572e.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 21:32:32 +0800
From:   Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <louis.yu@...iatek.com>, <roger.lu@...iatek.com>,
        <Allen-yy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
        Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: cpufreq: mediatek: add mt8186 cpufreq
 dt-bindings

On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 11:35 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/03/2022 10:42, Jia-Wei Chang wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 19:59 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 07/03/2022 13:21, Tim Chang wrote:
> > > > 1. add cci property.
> > > > 2. add example of MT8186.
> > > 
> > > One logical change at a time. Are these related? Why entirely new
> > > example just for "cci" node? Maybe this should be part of
> > > existing
> > > example?
> > 
> > Yes, the cci property is required in some SoC, e.g. mt8183 and
> > mt8186,
> > because cpu and cci share the same power supplies.
> 
> I asked why this cannot be part of existing example.

I misunderstood that.
I will update the complete example in the next version.

> 
> > I will update the commit message and add an example of mt8186 to
> > present usage of cci.
> 
> You added the example here, didn't you?

Yes, I did add it here.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof