linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 115/149] iommu/iova: Improve 32-bit free space estimate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220401142536.1948161-115-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  1 Apr 2022 10:25:02 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, joro@...tes.org,
        will@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 115/149] iommu/iova: Improve 32-bit free space estimate

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

[ Upstream commit 5b61343b50590fb04a3f6be2cdc4868091757262 ]

For various reasons based on the allocator behaviour and typical
use-cases at the time, when the max32_alloc_size optimisation was
introduced it seemed reasonable to couple the reset of the tracked
size to the update of cached32_node upon freeing a relevant IOVA.
However, since subsequent optimisations focused on helping genuine
32-bit devices make best use of even more limited address spaces, it
is now a lot more likely for cached32_node to be anywhere in a "full"
32-bit address space, and as such more likely for space to become
available from IOVAs below that node being freed.

At this point, the short-cut in __cached_rbnode_delete_update() really
doesn't hold up any more, and we need to fix the logic to reliably
provide the expected behaviour. We still want cached32_node to only move
upwards, but we should reset the allocation size if *any* 32-bit space
has become available.

Reported-by: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@...iatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Reviewed-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/033815732d83ca73b13c11485ac39336f15c3b40.1646318408.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/iova.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
index b28c9435b898..170e0f33040e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
@@ -95,10 +95,11 @@ __cached_rbnode_delete_update(struct iova_domain *iovad, struct iova *free)
 	cached_iova = to_iova(iovad->cached32_node);
 	if (free == cached_iova ||
 	    (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn &&
-	     free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo)) {
+	     free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo))
 		iovad->cached32_node = rb_next(&free->node);
+
+	if (free->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
 		iovad->max32_alloc_size = iovad->dma_32bit_pfn;
-	}

 	cached_iova = to_iova(iovad->cached_node);
 	if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo)
-- 
2.34.1