linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: eliminate code-block warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87010ada-86a2-4fb4-7ffd-8db1b656598d@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Apr 2022 23:24:58 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Harinder Singh <sharinder@...gle.com>,
        Tim Bird <tim.bird@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: eliminate code-block warnings

Hi David,

On 3/31/22 23:26, David Gow wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:47 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> Fix Sphinx complaints about code-block directive missing an argument.
>> For start.rst, add "none" since that is already heavily used in that
>> file. For run_wrapper.rst, use the simpler "::" literal block instead.
>>
>> dev-tools/kunit/start.rst:83: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>>
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:17: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:23: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:31: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:51: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:57: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:78: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:85: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:109: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:116: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:124: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:139: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>> dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst:162: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
>> 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
>>
>> Fixes: c48b9ef1f794 ("Documentation: KUnit: Rewrite getting started")
>> Fixes: 46201d47d6c4 ("Documentation: kunit: Reorganize documentation related to running tests")
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
>> Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
>> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Harinder Singh <sharinder@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...y.com>
>> ---
> 
> Thanks for fixing these.
> 
> Out of curiosity, is there a particular config option or version you
> need to set in sphinx to get these warnings? My setup (with Sphinx
> 4.3.2) doesn't warn on this.

No options. I expect that it's just an older version of Sphinx that
is causing this. I have v1.8.5 installed (comes with OpenSUSE Leap 15.3).

> Nevertheless, I'll keep a closer eye on code-block directives in future.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

thanks.
-- 
~Randy