[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkimB7AoV27gXFc9@bilrost>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 21:37:43 +0200
From: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 001/149] drm: Add orientation quirk for GPD
Win Max
Le Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 11:14:58AM +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 4/1/22 22:33, Anisse Astier wrote:
> > Hi Sasha,
> >
> > Le Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:23:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin a écrit :
> >> From: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
> >>
> >> [ Upstream commit 0b464ca3e0dd3cec65f28bc6d396d82f19080f69 ]
> >>
> >> Panel is 800x1280, but mounted on a laptop form factor, sideways.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>
> >> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
> >> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211229222200.53128-3-anisse@astier.eu
> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> >
> > I don't think this patch will be very useful, because it won't fix the
> > device's display orientation without the previous patch it came with,
> > titled "drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID"
> > (e35d8762b04f89f9f5a188d0c440d3a2c1d010ed); while I'd like both to be
> > added
>
> Well actually it will already put e.g. the text console the right way up
> since efifb also uses this quirks and gives a hint to fbcon to rotate
> the text. So it is not entirely useless.
>
> And since all quirks added to drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c
> typically get backported having this one in place now will avoid conflicts
> with future backports.
>
> That combined with not really seeing a downside to already having
> this in place even without the i915 support being sorted out makes
> me lean more towards the direction of believing that having this
> in 5.17 is fine...
>
Good points; lets's keep it in the stable queues.
Thanks,
Anisse
Powered by blists - more mailing lists