[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a66f17c6-cec6-3eb8-92df-9990d74dd122@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 22:12:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: haibo.chen@....com, aford@...conembedded.com,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: imx-esdhc: Update compatible
fallbacks
On 02/04/2022 21:39, Adam Ford wrote:
> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
> as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
> HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP,
> it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because
> those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm.
>
> Suggested-by: haibo.chen@....com
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> ---
> V3: Marked the imx7d-usdhc as deprecated when there are better
> fallback options or the fallback isn't needed.
> Leave the deprecated fallback in the YAML to prevent errors
> Remove Reviewed-by from Krzysztof Kozlowski due to the above
>
> V2: Update the table per recomendation from Haibo.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> index 7dbbcae9485c..11f039320d79 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> @@ -34,23 +34,34 @@ properties:
> - fsl,imx6ull-usdhc
> - fsl,imx7d-usdhc
> - fsl,imx7ulp-usdhc
> + - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> + - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
> - fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc
> - nxp,s32g2-usdhc
> - items:
> - enum:
> - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> + - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc
> + # fsl,imx7d-usdhc fallback is deprecated for imx8mm-usdhc
> + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
Instead of comment use (I think on the same level as items):
deprecated: true
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
So if this is a deprecated list, where is a proper one? The list with
this enum + imx8mm?
IOW, you need to list here:
1. Old combinations with "deprecated: true"
2. New combinations.
> - - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc
> - - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc
> - - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
> + - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> + # fsl,imx7d-usdhc fallback is deprecated
> - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
> - items:
> - enum:
> - - fsl,imx93-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc
> + - fsl,imx93-usdhc
> - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> -
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc
> + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
> + # fsl,imx7d-usdhc fallback is deprecated
> + - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists