linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] exfat: remove exfat_update_parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <HK2PR04MB38917E7782D96B44D0A19FA381E39@HK2PR04MB3891.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sat, 2 Apr 2022 03:45:59 +0000
From:   "Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>
To:     Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        "Andy.Wu@...y.com" <Andy.Wu@...y.com>,
        "Wataru.Aoyama@...y.com" <Wataru.Aoyama@...y.com>,
        "Daniel.Palmer@...y.com" <Daniel.Palmer@...y.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] exfat: remove exfat_update_parent_info()

Dear Namjae,

> I don't think there's any reason to split this patch from patch 1/2.
> Any thought to combine them to the one ?

The purpose of splitting this patch from patch 1/2 is to highlight the fix point for easier review.
If you think it is not necessary, it is OK to squash them to one.


Best Regards,
Yuezhang Mo