lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkkqdybZovAITy6k@workstation>
Date:   Sun, 3 Apr 2022 14:02:47 +0900
From:   Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
To:     Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Cc:     Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>,
        Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
        Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
        linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: remove check of list iterator against head
 past the loop body

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> When list_for_each_entry() completes the iteration over the whole list
> without breaking the loop, the iterator value will be a bogus pointer
> computed based on the head element.
> 
> While it is safe to use the pointer to determine if it was computed
> based on the head element, either with list_entry_is_head() or
> &pos->member == head, using the iterator variable after the loop should
> be avoided.
> 
> In preparation to limit the scope of a list iterator to the list
> traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/firewire/sbp2.c             | 13 +++++++------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

I think it is a good catch.

Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>

For the changes in firewire-core module:
Tested-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>

Unfortunately the activity for maintenance in Linux FireWire subsystem
is quite low. No actions in past half a year. If the patch blocks
further work to improve list implementation, I think it better to look
for the other path to merge.


Regards

Takashi Sakamoto

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ