[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rKFfv+=Yvu2HZEjLZs1MPLrkHQTA1iLikVf2dxC998YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 18:10:55 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Jan Varho <jan.varho@...il.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: fix add_hwgenerator_randomness entropy accounting
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 5:29 PM Jan Varho <jan.varho@...il.com> wrote:
> I thought about doing it that way, but the return value allows
> checking that any input was actually used instead of fast init
> completing in the mean time.
I'm not too worried about races here. If lots of things are fighting
to inject entropy here, we're not in a starved situation. Also, the
other callers aren't looking at the return value. Let's keep it
simple; there's little harm in doing so in this instance.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists