linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Convert vmcore to use an iov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:34:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     willy@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn,
        amit.kachhap@....com, hch@....de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Convert vmcore to use an iov_iter

> On Sat,  2 Apr 2022 12:30:05 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:

You were on the patch delivery path, so these patches should have had
your signoff.  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst explains.

> Copy the description of v3 cover letter from Willy:
> ===
> For some reason several people have been sending bad patches to fix
> compiler warnings in vmcore recently.  Here's how it should be done.
> Compile-tested only on x86.  As noted in the first patch, s390 should
> take this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined to do that
> work myself.

We should tell the S390 maintainers this!

Can you please fix the signoff issue, add the S390 team to Cc and resend?