linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 30/30] Documentation/x86: Document TDX kernel architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 04 Apr 2022 19:23:45 +1200
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 30/30] Documentation/x86: Document TDX kernel
 architecture

On Sun, 2022-04-03 at 23:25 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/3/22 21:32, Kai Huang wrote:
> > This is not the best way I believe.  I think we have two options here:
> > 1) Having dedicated tdx_guest.rst and tdx_host.rst
> > 2) Having a single tdx.rst to cover both TDX guest and host materials.
> > 
> > I don't know which way is better, perhaps 2).  
> > 
> > Kirill,
> > 
> > If 2) is better, could we add an additional level of menu to represent "TDX
> > guest support" and make all materials as sub-menu of it, if you need to send out
> > v8?
> 
> If the host support means that this needs to be reorganized, then the
> host support patches can do that.  Let's not make this more complicated
> than it has to be.

Sure. I'll do the change.

Still it would be appreciated if you guys can provide comments on which is
better.  Thanks.
 
-- 
Thanks,
-Kai