linux-kernel - [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: fix incorrect type in optee transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  4 Apr 2022 12:17:22 +0200
From:   Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: fix incorrect type in optee transport

Correct struct scmi_shared_mem references that should have __iomem
attribute. The issue was reported by kernel test robot:

drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c:428:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different address spaces) @@     expected struct scmi_shared_mem * @@     got struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem @@
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c:440:26: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected struct scmi_shared_mem [noderef] __iomem *shmem @@     got struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem @@

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
index 734f1eeee161..bcab9ff73103 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
@@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ static int scmi_optee_chan_free(int id, void *p, void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct scmi_shared_mem *get_channel_shm(struct scmi_optee_channel *chan,
-					       struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
+static struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *get_channel_shm(struct scmi_optee_channel *chan,
+						       struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 {
 	if (!chan)
 		return NULL;
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int scmi_optee_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 				   struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 {
 	struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info;
-	struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer);
+	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer);
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&channel->mu);
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void scmi_optee_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 				      struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 {
 	struct scmi_optee_channel *channel = cinfo->transport_info;
-	struct scmi_shared_mem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer);
+	struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem = get_channel_shm(channel, xfer);
 
 	shmem_fetch_response(shmem, xfer);
 }
-- 
2.17.1