[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 12:56:32 +0000
From: "Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)" <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)" <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
CC: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>,
"Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)" <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
"Kuogee Hsieh (QUIC)" <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org" <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@...cinc.com>,
"Aravind Venkateswaran (QUIC)" <quic_aravindh@...cinc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/8] drm/msm/dp: Support only IRQ_HPD and REPLUG
interrupts for eDP
Hi Doug,
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:03 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
> <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > @@ -1374,6 +1382,12 @@ static int dp_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> > dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_config(dp->catalog);
> >
> >
> > + if (dp->dp_display.connector_type ==
> DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort)
> > + dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
> > + DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK |
> > + DP_DP_HPD_UNPLUG_INT_MASK,
> > + true);
> > +
>
> nit: why are there two blank lines above?
>
>
Will remove a blank line.
> > @@ -1639,6 +1653,9 @@ void dp_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge
> *drm_bridge)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> > + dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> > +
>
> Should you add a "pre_enable" and do it there? That would make it more
> symmetric with the fact that you have the countertpart in "post_disable".
>
We want to handle the screen off or eDP disable like a cable unplug so that it can be integrated into the dp code.
So, we can move plug_handle into pre_enable and the unplug_handle to pre_disable.
If we do unplug in post_disable, we need to handle the state changes also. It will complicate the driver code.
>
> Overall: I'm probably not familiar enough with this code to give it a full
> review. I'm hoping that Dmitry knows it well enough... ;-)
>
>
> -Doug
Thank you,
Sankeerth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists