[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YksAJv//TJ6+j778@lorien.usersys.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:26:46 -0400
From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
kernel-team@...roid.com,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch/arm64: Fix topology initialization for core
scheduling
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 11:10:48AM +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:39:26 -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> > Arm64 systems rely on store_cpu_topology() to call update_siblings_masks()
> > to transfer the toplogy to the various cpu masks. This needs to be done
> > before the call to notify_cpu_starting() which tells the scheduler about
> > each cpu found, otherwise the core scheduling data structures are setup
> > in a way that does not match the actual topology.
> >
> > With smt_mask not setup correctly we bail on `cpumask_weight(smt_mask) == 1`
> > for !leaders in:
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
>
Thanks, Will!
Cheers,
Phil
> [1/1] arch/arm64: Fix topology initialization for core scheduling
> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/5524cbb1bfcd
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Will
>
> https://fixes.arm64.dev
> https://next.arm64.dev
> https://will.arm64.dev
>
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists