lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:13:22 -0400 From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:22 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:13:12 +0800 > David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote: > > > Does either (or both) of these features sound useful, and is this > > sort-of API the right model? (Personally, I think there's a reasonable > > scope for both.) Is anything obviously missing or wrong? Do the names, > > descriptions etc. make any sense? > > Obviously I'm biased toward the ftrace solution ;-) Personally, I like providing both - as long as we can keep the interface the same. Ftrace is less visually invasive, but it is also less flexible in capabilities, and requires substantial work to support on new architectures.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists