lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:13:22 -0400
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:22 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:13:12 +0800
> David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Does either (or both) of these features sound useful, and is this
> > sort-of API the right model? (Personally, I think there's a reasonable
> > scope for both.) Is anything obviously missing or wrong? Do the names,
> > descriptions etc. make any sense?
>
> Obviously I'm biased toward the ftrace solution ;-)

Personally, I like providing both - as long as we can keep the
interface the same.

Ftrace is less visually invasive, but it is also less flexible in
capabilities, and requires substantial work to support on new
architectures.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists