lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:19:42 +0530
From:   Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dianders@...omium.org>, <judyhsiao@...omium.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>,
        <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
CC:     Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add lpass cpu node


On 3/22/2022 1:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Thanks for your time Stephen!!!
> Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2022-03-21 05:28:15)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index 499299a..e6ec334 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,sdm845-aoss.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,sdm845-pdc.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/sound/qcom,lpass.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>>
>>   / {
>> @@ -1980,6 +1981,68 @@
>>                          #clock-cells = <1>;
>>                  };
>>
>> +               lpass_cpu: audio-subsystem@...0000 {
> The unit address should match the first reg address. This should be
> 3987000. By the way, 'subsystem' looks redundant. Maybe just
> 'audio@...7000' or 'subsystem@...7000'?
Okay. Will change accordingly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ