linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 0875/1126] sched/tracing: Report TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT tasks as TASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220405070433.219535150@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Apr 2022 09:27:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0875/1126] sched/tracing: Report TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT tasks as TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE

From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>

[ Upstream commit 25795ef6299f07ce3838f3253a9cb34f64efcfae ]

TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT currently isn't part of TASK_REPORT, thus a task blocking
on an rtlock will appear as having a task state == 0, IOW TASK_RUNNING.

The actual state is saved in p->saved_state, but reading it after reading
p->__state has a few issues:
o that could still be TASK_RUNNING in the case of e.g. rt_spin_lock
o ttwu_state_match() might have changed that to TASK_RUNNING

As pointed out by Eric, adding TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT to TASK_REPORT implies
exposing a new state to userspace tools which way not know what to do with
them. The only information that needs to be conveyed here is that a task is
waiting on an rt_mutex, which matches TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE - there's no
need for a new state.

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220120162520.570782-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index a76a178f8eb6..36e38434391c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1630,6 +1630,14 @@ static inline unsigned int __task_state_index(unsigned int tsk_state,
 	if (tsk_state == TASK_IDLE)
 		state = TASK_REPORT_IDLE;
 
+	/*
+	 * We're lying here, but rather than expose a completely new task state
+	 * to userspace, we can make this appear as if the task has gone through
+	 * a regular rt_mutex_lock() call.
+	 */
+	if (tsk_state == TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT)
+		state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
+
 	return fls(state);
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1