[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uPSr6+xcyqmBXZzuPb04v8KLNRou5Y+QvC7ibuAU_2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:13:11 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: renesas_internal_dmac: Fix typo's
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 5:45 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > > - /* This DMAC cannot handle if buffer is not 128-bytes alignment */
> > > > + /* This DMAC cannot handle if buffer is not 128-bytes aligned */
> > >
> > > Well, as we are here now, I think this can be further improved.
> > >
> > "The internal DMAC supports 128-bytes aligned buffers only", does this
> > sound good?
>
> I'd think it should be "128 byte aligned"? But I can't explain why, just
> a gut feeling.
>
Fine by me.
Let me know your thoughts on patch 1/2, I'll send a v2 with updated comment.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists