linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 0880/1126] btrfs: harden identification of a stale device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220405070433.360745294@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Apr 2022 09:27:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0880/1126] btrfs: harden identification of a stale device

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit 770c79fb65506fc7c16459855c3839429f46cb32 ]

Identifying and removing the stale device from the fs_uuids list is done
by btrfs_free_stale_devices().  btrfs_free_stale_devices() in turn
depends on device_path_matched() to check if the device appears in more
than one btrfs_device structure.

The matching of the device happens by its path, the device path. However,
when device mapper is in use, the dm device paths are nothing but a link
to the actual block device, which leads to the device_path_matched()
failing to match.

Fix this by matching the dev_t as provided by lookup_bdev() instead of
plain string compare of the device paths.

Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b07d382d53a8..24e559d90b6a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -534,15 +534,48 @@ btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(const char *device_path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool device_path_matched(const char *path, struct btrfs_device *device)
+/*
+ * Check if the device in the path matches the device in the given struct device.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *   true  If it is the same device.
+ *   false If it is not the same device or on error.
+ */
+static bool device_matched(const struct btrfs_device *device, const char *path)
 {
-	int found;
+	char *device_name;
+	dev_t dev_old;
+	dev_t dev_new;
+	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * If we are looking for a device with the matching dev_t, then skip
+	 * device without a name (a missing device).
+	 */
+	if (!device->name)
+		return false;
+
+	device_name = kzalloc(BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!device_name)
+		return false;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	found = strcmp(rcu_str_deref(device->name), path);
+	scnprintf(device_name, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX, "%s", rcu_str_deref(device->name));
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	return found == 0;
+	ret = lookup_bdev(device_name, &dev_old);
+	kfree(device_name);
+	if (ret)
+		return false;
+
+	ret = lookup_bdev(path, &dev_new);
+	if (ret)
+		return false;
+
+	if (dev_old == dev_new)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -575,9 +608,7 @@ static int btrfs_free_stale_devices(const char *path,
 					 &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
 			if (skip_device && skip_device == device)
 				continue;
-			if (path && !device->name)
-				continue;
-			if (path && !device_path_matched(path, device))
+			if (path && !device_matched(device, path))
 				continue;
 			if (fs_devices->opened) {
 				/* for an already deleted device return 0 */
-- 
2.34.1