[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220405070416.969633584@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:27:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0765/1017] powercap/dtpm_cpu: Reset per_cpu variable in the release function
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
[ Upstream commit 0aea2e4ec2a2bfa2d7e8820e37ba5b5ce04f20a5 ]
The release function does not reset the per cpu variable when it is
called. That will prevent creation again as the variable will be
already from the previous creation.
Fix it by resetting them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130210210.549877-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
index b740866b228d..1e8cac699646 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
@@ -150,10 +150,17 @@ static int update_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm)
static void pd_release(struct dtpm *dtpm)
{
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
if (freq_qos_request_active(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req))
freq_qos_remove_request(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req);
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
+ if (policy) {
+ for_each_cpu(dtpm_cpu->cpu, policy->related_cpus)
+ per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, dtpm_cpu->cpu) = NULL;
+ }
+
kfree(dtpm_cpu);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists