[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220405070433.822977108@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:27:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Reddy Muralidhar <muralidhar.reddy@...el.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...el.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0896/1126] ASoC: SOF: Intel: match sdw version on link_slaves_found
From: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit f67c0c0d3b9048d86ea6ae52e36a2b78c48f265d ]
Codecs with the same part id, manufacturer id and part id, but different
sdw version should be treated as different codecs. For example, rt711 and
rt711-sdca are different. So, we should match sdw version as well.
Reported-by: Reddy Muralidhar <muralidhar.reddy@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220120232157.199919-2-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
index 1385695d7745..848d1d563170 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
struct hdac_bus *bus = sof_to_bus(sdev);
struct sdw_intel_slave_id *ids = sdw->ids;
int num_slaves = sdw->num_slaves;
- unsigned int part_id, link_id, unique_id, mfg_id;
+ unsigned int part_id, link_id, unique_id, mfg_id, version;
int i, j, k;
for (i = 0; i < link->num_adr; i++) {
@@ -1198,12 +1198,14 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
mfg_id = SDW_MFG_ID(adr);
part_id = SDW_PART_ID(adr);
link_id = SDW_DISCO_LINK_ID(adr);
+ version = SDW_VERSION(adr);
for (j = 0; j < num_slaves; j++) {
/* find out how many identical parts were reported on that link */
if (ids[j].link_id == link_id &&
ids[j].id.part_id == part_id &&
- ids[j].id.mfg_id == mfg_id)
+ ids[j].id.mfg_id == mfg_id &&
+ ids[j].id.sdw_version == version)
reported_part_count++;
}
@@ -1212,21 +1214,24 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
if (ids[j].link_id != link_id ||
ids[j].id.part_id != part_id ||
- ids[j].id.mfg_id != mfg_id)
+ ids[j].id.mfg_id != mfg_id ||
+ ids[j].id.sdw_version != version)
continue;
/* find out how many identical parts are expected */
for (k = 0; k < link->num_adr; k++) {
u64 adr2 = link->adr_d[k].adr;
- unsigned int part_id2, link_id2, mfg_id2;
+ unsigned int part_id2, link_id2, mfg_id2, version2;
mfg_id2 = SDW_MFG_ID(adr2);
part_id2 = SDW_PART_ID(adr2);
link_id2 = SDW_DISCO_LINK_ID(adr2);
+ version2 = SDW_VERSION(adr2);
if (link_id2 == link_id &&
part_id2 == part_id &&
- mfg_id2 == mfg_id)
+ mfg_id2 == mfg_id &&
+ version2 == version)
expected_part_count++;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists