| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:31:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 1121/1126] mmc: rtsx: Let MMC core handle runtime PM
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
commit 7570fb41e450ba37bf9335fe3751fa9f502c30fa upstream.
Since MMC core handles runtime PM reference counting, we can avoid doing
redundant runtime PM work in the driver. That means the only thing
commit 5b4258f6721f ("misc: rtsx: rts5249 support runtime PM") misses is
to always enable runtime PM, to let its parent driver enable ASPM in the
runtime idle routine.
Fixes: 7499b529d97f ("mmc: rtsx: Use pm_runtime_{get,put}() to handle runtime PM")
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216055435.2335297-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 18 ------------------
1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
@@ -823,7 +823,6 @@ static void sd_request(struct work_struc
}
mutex_lock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
rtsx_pci_start_run(pcr);
@@ -860,8 +859,6 @@ static void sd_request(struct work_struc
data->bytes_xfered = data->blocks * data->blksz;
}
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
mutex_unlock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
finish:
@@ -1093,7 +1090,6 @@ static void sdmmc_set_ios(struct mmc_hos
return;
mutex_lock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
rtsx_pci_start_run(pcr);
@@ -1127,8 +1123,6 @@ static void sdmmc_set_ios(struct mmc_hos
rtsx_pci_switch_clock(pcr, ios->clock, host->ssc_depth,
host->initial_mode, host->double_clk, host->vpclk);
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
mutex_unlock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
}
@@ -1144,7 +1138,6 @@ static int sdmmc_get_ro(struct mmc_host
return -ENOMEDIUM;
mutex_lock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
rtsx_pci_start_run(pcr);
@@ -1154,8 +1147,6 @@ static int sdmmc_get_ro(struct mmc_host
if (val & SD_WRITE_PROTECT)
ro = 1;
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
mutex_unlock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
return ro;
@@ -1173,7 +1164,6 @@ static int sdmmc_get_cd(struct mmc_host
return cd;
mutex_lock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
rtsx_pci_start_run(pcr);
@@ -1183,8 +1173,6 @@ static int sdmmc_get_cd(struct mmc_host
if (val & SD_EXIST)
cd = 1;
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
mutex_unlock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
return cd;
@@ -1282,7 +1270,6 @@ static int sdmmc_switch_voltage(struct m
return err;
mutex_lock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
rtsx_pci_start_run(pcr);
@@ -1312,8 +1299,6 @@ out:
err = rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, SD_BUS_STAT,
SD_CLK_TOGGLE_EN | SD_CLK_FORCE_STOP, 0);
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
mutex_unlock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
return err;
@@ -1334,7 +1319,6 @@ static int sdmmc_execute_tuning(struct m
return err;
mutex_lock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
rtsx_pci_start_run(pcr);
@@ -1367,8 +1351,6 @@ static int sdmmc_execute_tuning(struct m
err = sd_change_phase(host, DDR50_RX_PHASE(pcr), true);
out:
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
mutex_unlock(&pcr->pcr_mutex);
return err;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists