linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 0605/1126] ext2: correct max file size computing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220405070425.393255998@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Apr 2022 09:22:32 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0605/1126] ext2: correct max file size computing

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 50b3a818991074177a56c87124c7a7bdf5fa4f67 ]

We need to calculate the max file size accurately if the total blocks
that can address by block tree exceed the upper_limit. But this check is
not correct now, it only compute the total data blocks but missing
metadata blocks are needed. So in the case of "data blocks < upper_limit
&& total blocks > upper_limit", we will get wrong result. Fortunately,
this case could not happen in reality, but it's confused and better to
correct the computing.

  bits   data blocks   metadatablocks   upper_limit
  10        16843020            66051    2147483647
  11       134480396           263171    1073741823
  12      1074791436          1050627     536870911 (*)
  13      8594130956          4198403     268435455 (*)
  14     68736258060         16785411     134217727 (*)
  15    549822930956         67125251      67108863 (*)
  16   4398314962956        268468227      33554431 (*)

  [*] Need to calculate in depth.

Fixes: 1c2d14212b15 ("ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220212050532.179055-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ext2/super.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
index 94f1fbd7d3ac..6d4f5ef74766 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
@@ -753,8 +753,12 @@ static loff_t ext2_max_size(int bits)
 	res += 1LL << (bits-2);
 	res += 1LL << (2*(bits-2));
 	res += 1LL << (3*(bits-2));
+	/* Compute how many metadata blocks are needed */
+	meta_blocks = 1;
+	meta_blocks += 1 + ppb;
+	meta_blocks += 1 + ppb + ppb * ppb;
 	/* Does block tree limit file size? */
-	if (res < upper_limit)
+	if (res + meta_blocks <= upper_limit)
 		goto check_lfs;
 
 	res = upper_limit;
-- 
2.34.1