linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 0325/1017] cpuidle: qcom-spm: Check if any CPU is managed by SPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220405070403.927275915@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Apr 2022 09:20:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0325/1017] cpuidle: qcom-spm: Check if any CPU is managed by SPM

From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>

[ Upstream commit 0ee30ace67e425ab83a1673bf51f50b577328cf9 ]

At the moment, the "qcom-spm-cpuidle" platform device is always created,
even if none of the CPUs is actually managed by the SPM. On non-qcom
platforms this will result in infinite probe-deferral due to the
failing qcom_scm_is_available() call.

To avoid this, look through the CPU DT nodes and check if there is
actually any CPU managed by a SPM (as indicated by the qcom,saw property).
It should also be available because e.g. MSM8916 has qcom,saw defined
but it's typically not enabled with ARM64/PSCI firmwares.

This is needed in preparation of a follow-up change that calls
qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr() a single time before registering any
cpuidle drivers. Otherwise this call might be made even on devices
that have this driver enabled but actually make use of PSCI.

Fixes: 60f3692b5f0b ("cpuidle: qcom_spm: Detach state machine from main SPM handling")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/86e3e09f-a8d7-3dff-3fc6-ddd7d30c5d78@samsung.com/
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211201130505.257379-2-stephan@gerhold.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
index 01e77913a414..5f27dcc6c110 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom-spm.c
@@ -155,6 +155,22 @@ static struct platform_driver spm_cpuidle_driver = {
 	},
 };
 
+static bool __init qcom_spm_find_any_cpu(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *cpu_node, *saw_node;
+
+	for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu_node) {
+		saw_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "qcom,saw", 0);
+		if (of_device_is_available(saw_node)) {
+			of_node_put(saw_node);
+			of_node_put(cpu_node);
+			return true;
+		}
+		of_node_put(saw_node);
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int __init qcom_spm_cpuidle_init(void)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -164,6 +180,10 @@ static int __init qcom_spm_cpuidle_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* Make sure there is actually any CPU managed by the SPM */
+	if (!qcom_spm_find_any_cpu())
+		return 0;
+
 	pdev = platform_device_register_simple("qcom-spm-cpuidle",
 					       -1, NULL, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
-- 
2.34.1