linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 0786/1017] ext4: correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220405070417.585711425@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  5 Apr 2022 09:28:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0786/1017] ext4: correct cluster len and clusters changed accounting in ext4_mb_mark_bb

From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit a5c0e2fdf7cea535ba03259894dc184e5a4c2800 ]

ext4_mb_mark_bb() currently wrongly calculates cluster len (clen) and
flex_group->free_clusters. This patch fixes that.

Identified based on code review of ext4_mb_mark_bb() function.

Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a0b035d536bafa88110b74456853774b64c8ac40.1644992609.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index e872ea582555..c0868b82a62f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3899,10 +3899,11 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	ext4_group_t group;
 	ext4_grpblk_t blkoff;
-	int i, clen, err;
+	int i, err;
 	int already;
+	unsigned int clen, clen_changed;
 
-	clen = EXT4_B2C(sbi, len);
+	clen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, len);
 
 	ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &group, &blkoff);
 	bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
@@ -3923,6 +3924,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
 		if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state)
 			already++;
 
+	clen_changed = clen - already;
 	if (state)
 		ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen);
 	else
@@ -3935,9 +3937,9 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
 						group, gdp));
 	}
 	if (state)
-		clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - clen + already;
+		clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - clen_changed;
 	else
-		clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + clen - already;
+		clen = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + clen_changed;
 
 	ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, clen);
 	ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp, bitmap_bh);
@@ -3947,10 +3949,13 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
 
 	if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
 		ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, group);
+		struct flex_groups *fg = sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi,
+					   s_flex_groups, flex_group);
 
-		atomic64_sub(len,
-			     &sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi, s_flex_groups,
-						  flex_group)->free_clusters);
+		if (state)
+			atomic64_sub(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
+		else
+			atomic64_add(clen_changed, &fg->free_clusters);
 	}
 
 	err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, bitmap_bh);
-- 
2.34.1