[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkxrQl4zDe6YSoNO@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:16:02 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] linux/compiler-clang.h: define function_nocfi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 01:19:15PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Use __builtin_function_start() to implement the function_nocfi() macro
> when CONFIG_CFI_CLANG is selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> index babb1347148c..c84fec767445 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,16 @@
> #define __nocfi __attribute__((__no_sanitize__("cfi")))
> #define __cficanonical __attribute__((__cfi_canonical_jump_table__))
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG)
> +/*
> + * With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address
> + * references with the address of the function's CFI jump table
> + * entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the
> + * actual function instead.
> + */
> +#define function_nocfi(x) __builtin_function_start(x)
> +#endif
As a heads-up, with patches 1 and 2 applied (but not patch 3), we have two
definitions of function_nocfi(), which casues the compiler to scream for every
object:
| In file included from <built-in>:3:
| In file included from ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:107:
| ./arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h:33:9: warning: 'function_nocfi' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
| #define function_nocfi(x) ({ \
| ^
| ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:79:9: note: previous definition is here
| #define function_nocfi(x) __builtin_function_start(x)
| ^
| 1 warning generated.
... which would be painful for bisection.
I suspect It's probably worth folding patches 2 and 3 together to avoid that?
Arguably we could fold the entire series together into one commit at that
point.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists