[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ykwn0MpcrZ/N+LOG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:28:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ptrace: fix ptrace vs tasklist_lock race on
PREEMPT_RT.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 12:29:03PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > As is, I think we can write task_is_stopped() like:
> >
> > #define task_is_stopped(task) ((task)->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING)
> >
> > Because jobctl is in fact the canonical state.
>
> Not really. JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING means that the task should stop.
>
> And this flag is cleared right before set_special_state(TASK_STOPPED)
> in do_signal_stop(), see task_participate_group_stop().
Argh! More work then :-( Still, I really want to not have p->__state be
actual unique state.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists