linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kernel-hacking: minor edits for style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:54:57 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kernel-hacking: minor edits for style

Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org> writes:

> Rusty's kernel-hacking guides provide important information, however
> they are written in a narrative style that some readers may interpret as
> off-putting. Since the goal is to make kernel documentation accessible
> to as many new developers as possible, it's best to avoid the turns of
> phrase that require a specific cultural context to properly understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 36 ++++++++++++------------
>  Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst |  5 +---
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

*Sigh*...it's kind of sad to see the character of Rusty's writing being
chipped away over time; this isn't the first sanitization patch applied
to this file.  It certainly needs a lot more work than this to match
current practice.  Oh well, I've applied it, thanks.

jon