[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220405070412.768251580@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:15:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0176/1126] btrfs: zoned: mark relocation as writing
From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
commit ca5e4ea0beaec8bc674121838bf8614c089effb9 upstream.
There is a hung_task issue with running generic/068 on an SMR
device. The hang occurs while a process is trying to thaw the
filesystem. The process is trying to take sb->s_umount to thaw the
FS. The lock is held by fsstress, which calls btrfs_sync_fs() and is
waiting for an ordered extent to finish. However, as the FS is frozen,
the ordered extents never finish.
Having an ordered extent while the FS is frozen is the root cause of
the hang. The ordered extent is initiated from btrfs_relocate_chunk()
which is called from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work().
This commit adds sb_*_write() around btrfs_relocate_chunk() call
site. For the usual "btrfs balance" command, we already call it with
mnt_want_file() in btrfs_ioctl_balance().
Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.13+
Link: https://github.com/naota/linux/issues/56
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 8 +++++++-
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1522,8 +1522,12 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
return;
- if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE))
+ sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
+
+ if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {
+ sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return;
+ }
/*
* Long running balances can keep us blocked here for eternity, so
@@ -1531,6 +1535,7 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_
*/
if (!mutex_trylock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock)) {
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
+ sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return;
}
@@ -1605,6 +1610,7 @@ next:
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
+ sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
}
void btrfs_reclaim_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -8299,10 +8299,12 @@ static int relocating_repair_kthread(voi
target = cache->start;
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
+ sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"zoned: skip relocating block group %llu to repair: EBUSY",
target);
+ sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -8330,6 +8332,7 @@ out:
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
+ sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists