[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220405070411.748592937@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:14:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0142/1126] block: limit request dispatch loop duration
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
commit 572299f03afd676dd4e20669cdaf5ed0fe1379d4 upstream.
When IO requests are made continuously and the target block device
handles requests faster than request arrival, the request dispatch loop
keeps on repeating to dispatch the arriving requests very long time,
more than a minute. Since the loop runs as a workqueue worker task, the
very long loop duration triggers workqueue watchdog timeout and BUG [1].
To avoid the very long loop duration, break the loop periodically. When
opportunity to dispatch requests still exists, check need_resched(). If
need_resched() returns true, the dispatch loop already consumed its time
slice, then reschedule the dispatch work and break the loop. With heavy
IO load, need_resched() does not return true for 20~30 seconds. To cover
such case, check time spent in the dispatch loop with jiffies. If more
than 1 second is spent, reschedule the dispatch work and break the loop.
[1]
[ 609.691437] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 stuck for 35s!
[ 609.701820] Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
[ 609.707915] workqueue events: flags=0x0
[ 609.712615] pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[ 609.712626] pending: drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
[ 609.712687] workqueue events_freezable: flags=0x4
[ 609.732943] pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[ 609.732952] pending: pci_pme_list_scan
[ 609.732968] workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x80
[ 609.751947] pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[ 609.751955] pending: neigh_managed_work
[ 609.752018] workqueue kblockd: flags=0x18
[ 609.769480] pwq 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 active=3/256 refcnt=4
[ 609.769488] in-flight: 1020:blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 609.769498] pending: blk_mq_timeout_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 609.769744] pool 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 hung=35s workers=2 idle: 67
[ 639.899730] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 stuck for 66s!
[ 639.909513] Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
[ 639.915404] workqueue events: flags=0x0
[ 639.920197] pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
[ 639.920215] pending: drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
[ 639.920365] workqueue kblockd: flags=0x18
[ 639.939932] pwq 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 active=3/256 refcnt=4
[ 639.939942] in-flight: 1020:blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 639.939955] pending: blk_mq_timeout_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 639.940212] pool 21: cpus=10 node=1 flags=0x0 nice=-20 hung=66s workers=2 idle: 67
Fixes: 6e6fcbc27e778 ("blk-mq: support batching dispatch in case of io")
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220310091649.zypaem5lkyfadymg@shindev/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220318022641.133484-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -180,11 +180,18 @@ static int __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(st
static int blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
+ unsigned long end = jiffies + HZ;
int ret;
do {
ret = __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
- } while (ret == 1);
+ if (ret != 1)
+ break;
+ if (need_resched() || time_is_before_jiffies(end)) {
+ blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 0);
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (1);
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists