linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.16 0000/1017] 5.16.19-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9882445d-ef29-689a-33de-ce66dfc79d31@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:03:24 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 0000/1017] 5.16.19-rc1 review

On 4/5/22 1:15 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.19 release.
> There are 1017 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Apr 2022 07:01:33 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.19-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
  
Build failed on my system. The following is the problem commit. There
are no changes to the config between 5.16.18 and this build.

Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
     ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: Remove link assignment limitation

   CC [M]  sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.o
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.c: In function ‘hda_link_stream_assign’:
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.c:86:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_chip_info’; did you mean ‘get_group_info’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    86 |                 chip = get_chip_info(sdev->pdata);
       |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                        get_group_info
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.c:86:22: error: assignment to ‘const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
    86 |                 chip = get_chip_info(sdev->pdata);
       |                      ^
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.c:94:35: error: ‘const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc’ has no member named ‘quirks’
    94 |                         if (!(chip->quirks & SOF_INTEL_PROCEN_FMT_QUIRK)) {
       |                                   ^~
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.c:94:46: error: ‘SOF_INTEL_PROCEN_FMT_QUIRK’ undeclared (first use in this function)
    94 |                         if (!(chip->quirks & SOF_INTEL_PROCEN_FMT_QUIRK)) {
       |                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.c:94:46: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:287: sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dai.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:549: sound/soc/sof/intel] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:549: sound/soc/sof] Error 2
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:549: sound/soc] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1846: sound] Error 2

thanks,
-- Shuah