[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yk0i/pODntZ7lbDo@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:19:58 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, djwong@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
hch@...radead.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, willy@...radead.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] dax: add DAX_RECOVERY flag and .recovery_write
dev_pgmap_ops
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:47:45PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> Introduce DAX_RECOVERY flag to dax_direct_access(). The flag is
> not set by default in dax_direct_access() such that the helper
> does not translate a pmem range to kernel virtual address if the
> range contains uncorrectable errors. When the flag is set,
> the helper ignores the UEs and return kernel virtual adderss so
> that the caller may get on with data recovery via write.
>
> Also introduce a new dev_pagemap_ops .recovery_write function.
> The function is applicable to FSDAX device only. The device
> page backend driver provides .recovery_write function if the
> device has underlying mechanism to clear the uncorrectable
> errors on the fly.
I know Dan suggested it, but I still think dev_pagemap_ops is the very
wrong choice here. It is about VM callbacks to ZONE_DEVICE owners
independent of what pagemap type they are. .recovery_write on the
other hand is completely specific to the DAX write path and has no
MM interactions at all.
> /* see "strong" declaration in tools/testing/nvdimm/pmem-dax.c */
> __weak long __pmem_direct_access(struct pmem_device *pmem, pgoff_t pgoff,
> - long nr_pages, void **kaddr, pfn_t *pfn)
> + long nr_pages, int flags, void **kaddr, pfn_t *pfn)
> {
> resource_size_t offset = PFN_PHYS(pgoff) + pmem->data_offset;
> + sector_t sector = PFN_PHYS(pgoff) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + unsigned int num = PFN_PHYS(nr_pages) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + struct badblocks *bb = &pmem->bb;
> + sector_t first_bad;
> + int num_bad;
> + bool bad_in_range;
> + long actual_nr;
> +
> + if (!bb->count)
> + bad_in_range = false;
> + else
> + bad_in_range = !!badblocks_check(bb, sector, num, &first_bad, &num_bad);
>
> - if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512,
> - PFN_PHYS(nr_pages))))
> + if (bad_in_range && !(flags & DAX_RECOVERY))
> return -EIO;
The use of bad_in_range here seems a litle convoluted. See the attached
patch on how I would structure the function to avoid the variable and
have the reocvery code in a self-contained chunk.
> - map_len = dax_direct_access(dax_dev, pgoff, PHYS_PFN(size),
> - &kaddr, NULL);
> + nrpg = PHYS_PFN(size);
> + map_len = dax_direct_access(dax_dev, pgoff, nrpg, 0, &kaddr, NULL);
Overly long line here.
View attachment "diff" of type "text/plain" (2352 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists