[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220405232413.6b38e966@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 23:24:13 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/599] 5.10.110-rc1 review
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 23:08:12 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Here's a thought, if you decide to backport a patch to stable, and you see
> that there's another commit with a "Fixes" tag to the automatically
> selected commit. DO NOT BACKPORT IF THE FIXES PATCH FAILS TO GO BACK TOO!
Seriously. This should be the case for *all* backported patches, not just
the AUTOSEL ones.
Otherwise you are backporting a commit to "stable" that is KNOWN TO BE
BROKEN!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists