linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] mmc: core: improve API to make clear hw_reset from bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yk1JA4TWO9bTt0kb@ninjato>
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:02:11 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/10] mmc: core: improve API to make clear hw_reset
 from bus_ops is for cards


> > To make it unambiguous that bus_ops->hw_reset() is for cards and not for
> > controllers, we a) add 'card' to the function name and b) make the
> > function argument mmc_card instead of mmc_host. All users are converted,
> > too.
> 
> Again b) is sufficient in my opinion. All bus_ops are for cards, while
> host_ops are for hosts.

Okay, this argument I buy right away.

> Also, there may be some corner cases where b) can't be done, like the
> ->remove() bus_ops for example. In that case, we either have to make
> more re-structuring of the code of simply live with that there may be
> some special cases.

With the above argument, I could even imaging to simply drop this patch?
That keeps 'host' consistently as the default argument? All given that
'bus_ops' are for cards anyway.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)