[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220406085643.33100-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date:   Wed,  6 Apr 2022 10:56:42 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] delay: rename fsleep to usleep_autoyield
I recently stumbled over the relatively new function fsleep(). While I
think it is usful, I also think the name is too short to be
self-explanatory. This is why I suggest a rename before it gets even
wider use in the kernel. Once this rename is upstream, I will convert
the users. The churn is still in the acceptable range with 12 patches
and 70 lines changed IMO.
The name 'usleep_autoyield' is the best I could come up with, but if you
can think of something better I am all ears.
Please let me know what you think!
All the best,
   Wolfram
Wolfram Sang (1):
  delay: rename fsleep to usleep_autoyield
 Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst | 2 +-
 include/linux/delay.h                 | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
