[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c728cb4c-6a87-94b6-b087-bbf2b55af35c@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:39:53 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<william.kucharski@...cle.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<agruenba@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filemap: remove obsolete comment in lock_page
On 2022/4/4 23:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 02:22:18PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> lock_page needs the caller to have a reference on the page->mapping inode
>> due to sync_page. Also lock_page_nosync is introduced which does not do a
>> sync_page via commit db37648cd6ce ("[PATCH] mm: non syncing lock_page()").
>> But commit 7eaceaccab5f ("block: remove per-queue plugging") kills off the
>> old plugging along with aops->sync_page() and lock_page_nosync. So there
>> is no need to have a reference on the page->mapping inode when calling
>> lock_page anymore. Remove this obsolete and confusing comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> Thanks. I'll fix up the changelog (some of the tenses are a little
> strange) and take this through my pagecache tree.
Many thanks for doing this. :)
>
>> include/linux/pagemap.h | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
>> index 993994cd943a..8dfe8e49c427 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
>> @@ -908,9 +908,6 @@ static inline void folio_lock(struct folio *folio)
>> __folio_lock(folio);
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * lock_page may only be called if we have the page's inode pinned.
>> - */
>> static inline void lock_page(struct page *page)
>> {
>> struct folio *folio;
>> --
>> 2.23.0
>>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists