[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42e890bef5927f2c4854c146f9bab2f974b64a48.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:49:59 +0800
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<airlied@...ux.ie>, <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
<jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>, <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
<allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: Correct disp_aal
binding for MT8183
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 12:38 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 06/04/22 11:46, Rex-BC Chen ha scritto:
> > The driver data of MT8183 and MT8173 are different.
> > The value of has_gamma for MT8173 is true while the value of MT8183
> > is
> > false. Therefore, the compatible of disp_aal for MT8183 is not
> > suitable
> > for the compatible for MT8173.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
>
> Hello!
> Yes, I definitely agree with this change, it makes no sense to have
> both
> 8173 and 8183 compatibles for 8183 (and similar).
>
> Though, please, add a note in this commit message advertising that
> the
> mistake was only in the yaml binding, as the driver doesn't require
> any
> functional changes, so that things are clear for people with less
> expertise
> on MediaTek platforms.
>
> After that:
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Hello Angelo,
Thanks for your review.
I will add them to the commit message in next version.
BRs,
Rex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists