[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yk13VJwih44VsCGk@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:19:48 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -next V2 4/7] arm64: add copy_from_user to machine
check safe
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:13:08AM +0000, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> Add scenarios copy_from_user to machine check safe.
>
> The data copied is user data and is machine check safe, so just kill
> the user process and isolate the error page, not necessary panic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h
> index 0557af834e03..f31c8978e1af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h
> @@ -92,4 +92,20 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
>
> _asm_extable 8888b,\l;
> .endm
> +
> + .macro user_ldp_mc l, reg1, reg2, addr, post_inc
> +8888: ldtr \reg1, [\addr];
> +8889: ldtr \reg2, [\addr, #8];
> + add \addr, \addr, \post_inc;
> +
> + _asm_extable_mc 8888b, \l;
> + _asm_extable_mc 8889b, \l;
> + .endm
> +
> + .macro user_ldst_mc l, inst, reg, addr, post_inc
> +8888: \inst \reg, [\addr];
> + add \addr, \addr, \post_inc;
> +
> + _asm_extable_mc 8888b, \l;
> + .endm
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> index 34e317907524..d9d7c5291871 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> */
>
> .macro ldrb1 reg, ptr, val
> - user_ldst 9998f, ldtrb, \reg, \ptr, \val
> + user_ldst_mc 9998f, ldtrb, \reg, \ptr, \val
> .endm
>
> .macro strb1 reg, ptr, val
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
> .endm
>
> .macro ldrh1 reg, ptr, val
> - user_ldst 9997f, ldtrh, \reg, \ptr, \val
> + user_ldst_mc 9997f, ldtrh, \reg, \ptr, \val
> .endm
>
> .macro strh1 reg, ptr, val
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> .endm
>
> .macro ldr1 reg, ptr, val
> - user_ldst 9997f, ldtr, \reg, \ptr, \val
> + user_ldst_mc 9997f, ldtr, \reg, \ptr, \val
> .endm
>
> .macro str1 reg, ptr, val
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
> .endm
>
> .macro ldp1 reg1, reg2, ptr, val
> - user_ldp 9997f, \reg1, \reg2, \ptr, \val
> + user_ldp_mc 9997f, \reg1, \reg2, \ptr, \val
> .endm
>
> .macro stp1 reg1, reg2, ptr, val
> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_from_user)
> ret
>
> // Exception fixups
> -9997: cmp dst, dstin
> +9997: cbz x0, 9998f // Check machine check exception
> + cmp dst, dstin
> b.ne 9998f
If you look at the copy template, you'd see that `dstin` *is* x0.
Consier if we took a non-SEA fault. The the fixup handler will overwrite x0,
it's likely `dst` != `dstin`, and we'll branch to the byte-by-byte copy. Or if
we're doing something odd and mmap_min_addr is 0, we can do the wrong thing the
other way around and *not* branch to the byte-by-byte copy when we should.
So this is at best confusing, but likely broken too.
Thanks,
Mark.
> // Before being absolutely sure we couldn't copy anything, try harder
> USER(9998f, ldtrb tmp1w, [srcin])
> --
> 2.18.0.huawei.25
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists