| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:16:40 +0530
From: "Sajida Bhanu (Temp)" <quic_c_sbhanu@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
<quic_rampraka@...cinc.com>, <quic_pragalla@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sartgarg@...cinc.com>, <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sayalil@...cinc.com>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Reset GCC_SDCC_BCR register for SDHC
On 4/1/2022 12:12 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 31 Mar 00:03 PDT 2022, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
>
>> Reset GCC_SDCC_BCR register before every fresh initilazation. This will
>> reset whole SDHC-msm controller, clears the previous power control
>> states and avoids, software reset timeout issues as below.
>>
>> [ 5.458061][ T262] mmc1: Reset 0x1 never completed.
>> [ 5.462454][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
>> [ 5.469065][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00007202
>> [ 5.475688][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Blk size: 0x00000000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.482315][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.488927][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Present: 0x01f800f0 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.495539][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Power: 0x00000000 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.502162][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000003
>> [ 5.508768][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.515381][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.521996][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.528607][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Caps: 0x362dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x0000808f
>> [ 5.535227][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.541841][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Resp[0]: 0x00000000 | Resp[1]: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.548454][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Resp[2]: 0x00000000 | Resp[3]: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.555079][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
>> [ 5.559651][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: ----------- VENDOR REGISTER DUMP-----------
>> [ 5.566621][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: DLL sts: 0x00000000 | DLL cfg: 0x6000642c | DLL cfg2: 0x0020a000
>> [ 5.575465][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: DLL cfg3: 0x00000000 | DLL usr ctl: 0x00010800 | DDR cfg: 0x80040873
>> [ 5.584658][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: Vndr func: 0x00018a9c | Vndr func2 : 0xf88218a8 Vndr func3: 0x02626040
>>
>> Fixes: 0eb0d9f4de34 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Initial support for Qualcomm chipsets")
>> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <quic_c_sbhanu@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since V2:
>> - Dropped new line after fixes tag as suggested by Bjorn
>> Andersson.
>> - Passed device structure instead of passing platform_device
>> structure as a argument for sdhci_msm_gcc_reset() as suggested
>> by Bjorn Andersson.
>> - Replaced dev_err() with dev_err_probe() as suggested by Bjorn
>> Andersson.
> Thanks, looks much better. Still some things I would like to see
> improved below.
Sure
>> Changes since V1:
>> - Added fixes tag as suggested by Ulf Hansson.
>> - Replaced devm_reset_control_get() with
>> devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() as suggested by
>> Ulf Hansson.
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> index 50c71e0..e15e789 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/interconnect.h>
>> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>>
>> #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
>> #include "cqhci.h"
>> @@ -284,6 +285,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>> bool uses_tassadar_dll;
>> u32 dll_config;
>> u32 ddr_config;
>> + struct reset_control *core_reset;
>> bool vqmmc_enabled;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -2482,6 +2484,39 @@ static inline void sdhci_msm_get_of_property(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,dll-config", &msm_host->dll_config);
>> }
>>
>> +static int sdhci_msm_gcc_reset(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host)
>> +{
>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>> + int ret = 0;
> First use of this variable is an assignment, so no need to initialize it
> here.
Sure
>> +
>> + msm_host->core_reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, "core_reset");
> reset-names will only be used to identify resets and hence there's no
> reason to include "_reset" in the identifier.
>
> If this is the only reset for the controller, there's actually no reason
> for identifying it, you can omit reset-names from the binding and just
> pass NULL here (to get the first resets = <>).
ok Sure
>> + if (IS_ERR(msm_host->core_reset))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(msm_host->core_reset),
>> + "unable to acquire core_reset\n");
>> +
>> + if (!msm_host->core_reset)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = reset_control_assert(msm_host->core_reset);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "core_reset assert failed\n");
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The hardware requirement for delay between assert/deassert
>> + * is at least 3-4 sleep clock (32.7KHz) cycles, which comes to
>> + * ~125us (4/32768). To be on the safe side add 200us delay.
>> + */
>> + usleep_range(200, 210);
>> +
>> + ret = reset_control_deassert(msm_host->core_reset);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "core_reset deassert failed\n");
>> +
>> + usleep_range(200, 210);
>> +
> sdhci_msm_gcc_reset() is only called once during probe(), so there's no
> reason to carry the reset_control pointer in struct sdhci_msm_host. Make
> it a local variable and use reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() and
> reset_control_put() the reset here before returning.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
Sure Thanks for the review.
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -2529,6 +2564,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> msm_host->saved_tuning_phase = INVALID_TUNING_PHASE;
>>
>> + ret = sdhci_msm_gcc_reset(&pdev->dev, host);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto pltfm_free;
>> +
>> /* Setup SDCC bus voter clock. */
>> msm_host->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus");
>> if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk)) {
>> --
>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
>> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists